Post new topic   Reply to topic    7th Fleet Forum Index -> The Quarterdeck
View previous topic :: View next topic  
BigBob357

user avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2015
Posts:

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0

So the new ship for the new ST series is the USS Discovery and it's . . . you know what? Fuck it. That thing is mind-bogglingly hideous. Apparently the lazy as creative team behind this monstrosity slapped a Fed saucer on Klink rear end and called it a night. I mean for fuck's sake, they didn't even try. If this is any indication of the quality of storylines we're gonna get then we're in for a real let down. I'm not even going to post a link. If you really want to see this thing, then look it up. But I personally don't think we should sully this great website with images of that abomination. If anyone finds a a petition to have this ship design scrapped let me know.



_________________
Lenfest



Joined: 29 Jun 2016
Posts:

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0

Ok I looked it up and WTF. It really is a fed saucer on a klingon battleship. Not only that but their laziness somehow managed to make it look uglier then either of the two looked on their own. So it doesn't do either the klingons or the federation any justice.

Z. Barrett
Engineering - Captain

user avatar
Awarded:
Joined: 08 Nov 2015
Posts: 75

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0

Actually, the Discovery uses a rejected concept design for the aborted Star Trek Phase II series in the late 1970's before the idea of the motion picture took off. Look at Ralph McQuarrie design and compare it to the Discovery...same ship...and just as ugly.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_Enterprise#/media/File:Phase_II_Enterprise.jpg



_________________
Dr. Collin McGee
Tactical - Captain

user avatar
Awarded:
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 146

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0

the Star Trek: Phase II Enterprise

 

the Star Trek: Discovery starship

 

there is a reason why the original was rejected... its a mess. LOL



_________________

"No Horizon, Too Distant"
Valeʼncynos
Engineering - Captain

user avatar

Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 87

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0

I can probably see the reasoning,  experimenting with cloaking technology?  Who knows, but I would fly it, looks better than the Enterprise J



_________________
VADM Wulfric Richter CoS
Tactical - Vice Admiral

user avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Posts: 403

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0

At least it looks better than the Excelsior. Got to hand it to the Feds, they can make some ugly ships. I mean, take the Enterprise-J. That thing looks like a cockroach that was run over by a steamroller.

Apparently, aesthetics dies horribly in the future.



_________________
BigBob357

user avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2015
Posts:

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0
Knightnblu wrote:

At least it looks better than the Excelsior. Got to hand it to the Feds, they can make some ugly ships. I mean, take the Enterprise-J. That thing looks like a cockroach that was run over by a steamroller.

Apparently, aesthetics dies horribly in the future.

 The Excelsior (and the Enterprise-B) is a beautiful ship. The Enterprise-J, if that is what we can call it, is poorly rendered, and made by Cryptic (key point).   



_________________
Nimmoth
Engineering - Captain

user avatar
Awarded:
Joined: 26 Jun 2015
Posts: 306

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0

wow, just wow. i bet the theme song to enterprise (its been a long while..) is playing in it's turbolift. 



_________________
        

        Captain Nimmoth, USS Mandragoran, "Lucky" 7th Fleet, Starfleet Command, UFP
Christian M. Hanson
Tactical - Rear Admiral

user avatar
Awarded:
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 948

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0

I don't hate it.. If it's TOS era-ish then the concept makes sense for the time. 



_________________
Chief of Personnel
Anton Mercer
Engineering - Captain

user avatar
Awarded:
Joined: 20 Sep 2009
Posts: 1620

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0
Christian M. Hanson wrote:

I don't hate it.. If it's TOS era-ish then the concept makes sense for the time. 

 Shut up you.. you arn't here for a month remember? 



_________________
Morgan Shackelford
sparrow794
Tactical - Vice Admiral

user avatar
Awarded:
Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Posts: 3119

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0
BigBob357 wrote:
Knightnblu wrote:

At least it looks better than the Excelsior. Got to hand it to the Feds, they can make some ugly ships. I mean, take the Enterprise-J. That thing looks like a cockroach that was run over by a steamroller.

Apparently, aesthetics dies horribly in the future.

 The Excelsior (and the Enterprise-B) is a beautiful ship. The Enterprise-J, if that is what we can call it, is poorly rendered, and made by Cryptic (key point).   

The Enterprise J is not a Cryptic design.  

 



_________________
Wupteedo
Science - Fleet Captain

user avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 1222

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0

The Star Trek "universe" is full of strange and interesting stories about the actual production.  This is one of my favorites:

http://ottens.co.uk/forgottentrek/designing-the-reliant/

 

Captain Lang's "Flagship" is a Miranda. 

A wise space skipper once said:  "Love. You can learn all the math in the 'Verse, but you take a boat in the air that you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps her in the air when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurtin' 'fore she keels. Makes her a home." - Captain Mal Reynolds, Serenity

Qa'pla

 



_________________

Improvise    Adapt    Overcome
 
BigBob357

user avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2015
Posts:

Send private message
Reply with quote

re: U.S.S .Discovery NCC-1031

0
sparrow794 wrote:
BigBob357 wrote:
Knightnblu wrote:

At least it looks better than the Excelsior. Got to hand it to the Feds, they can make some ugly ships. I mean, take the Enterprise-J. That thing looks like a cockroach that was run over by a steamroller.

Apparently, aesthetics dies horribly in the future.

 The Excelsior (and the Enterprise-B) is a beautiful ship. The Enterprise-J, if that is what we can call it, is poorly rendered, and made by Cryptic (key point).   

The Enterprise J is not a Cryptic design.  

 

 No, it is not. that was poor wording on my part. I just meant that the way it is render, where it looks like a cockroach that go ran over by a steamroller, is on Cryptic. In the Queue Battle of Procyon 5, it looks like they stretched a 2D image of the saucer in Microsoft Paint. 



_________________
Posts from:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    7th Fleet Forum Index -> The Quarterdeck All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum